Compare two results

Relevant Risks to this Type of Project

#projects #Risks type delivery method size
5 116 Interchange All All
Number Risk Frequency Prob Cost Schedule
1 potential delays related to utilities / cta; coordination with the city 100 0.90
4.32
2 historic structures may be present (sec. 106) - long approval process for cultural resources could affect schedule and design 80 0.06 0.01 0.09
3 erosion control - i-285/sr400 interchange 80 0.50 0.63
4 complex structure optimization on i-285/sr400 interchange 80 0.40 -1.41
5 presence of hazardous materials-within existing or proposed right of way may increase project cost 80 0.09 0.04
6 contractor claims potential 80 0.70 1.79
7 green valley & cordelia faults may create significant geotechnical risks / hazards or delay approval of structural design of certain bridges if they cross one of the faults. 60 0.13 0.03
8 construction packaging 60 0.15 -4.00 -1.00
9 paleontological sites could be found within the project which would temporarily shut down construction 60 0.08 0.00 0.17
10 agricultural mitigation will likely be required and could add additional reviews 60 0.08
0.10
11 hazardous materials - sr400 cd lanes 60 0.20 0.05
12 right of way certification process could be slow 60 0.15
0.10
13 sr400 right of way 60 0.67 2.92
14 transmission lines 60 0.33 6.93
15 rail road crossing 60 0.43 0.87 0.60
16 response from/coordination with usfws and noaa fisheries may be slow 60 0.05
0.09
17 too few bids at time of construction could drive up project cost 60 0.28 1.70
18 public involvement scope modification allowance - i-285/sr400 interchange 60 0.48 0.84
19 temporary structures associated with traffic 60 0.17 -1.24
20 potential delays to i- 290 and congress parkway work 60 0.90
1.35
21 agency program management - i-285/sr400 60 0.75 -0.13
22 geotechnical 60 0.33 1.78
23 owner's verification costs - i-285/sr400 interchange 60 0.85 -0.50
24 opportunity design change for watertown plank road interchange 40 0.30 -1.20 1.35
25 external - political factors change 40 0.50

26 external - local communities pose objections 40 0.25
1.13
27 right of way acquisition is more costly than expected 40 0.35 14.91
28 technical - changes to noise abatement wall design 40 0.50

29 technical - inaccurate assumptions on technical issues in planning stage 40 0.50

30 potential environmental process delay of the record of decision. (decided not to model because risk is slow minimal) 40


31 technical - right of way analysis in error 40 0.50

32 technical - design incomplete 40 0.90 24.19
33 higher real estate cost due to development, annexation, rezoning 40 0.20 0.80
34 inflation risk 40 0.80 14.40 14.40
35 may have to use in-line storage because of non-standard storm water treatment requirements from mmsd. 40 0.70 10.50
36 opportunity to reduce traffic mitigation costs 40 0.20 -1.00
37 external - new stakeholders emerge and demand new work 40 0.50

38 pavement design on sr400 40 0.80 -2.40
39 external - influential stakeholders and serve own purposes 40 0.50

40 construction - winter protection for concrete curing 40 0.50

41 traffic signals 40 0.80 1.44
42 lighting and its 40 0.10 0.18
43 special waste 40 0.90 2.38
44 drainage risks 40 0.40 0.40
45 potential for addition of contracts 40 0.70 2.45
46 advanced contract for closure and removal of i- 290 se ramp and wb- sb ramp 40 0.90 3.15 2.25
47 duration of flyover contract 40 0.90

48 retaining wall additions potential 40 0.50

49 construction - weather delays 40 0.50

50 construction - vibration foundation issues in adjacent buildings 40 0.50

51 external - threat of lawsuits 40 0.50

52 construction - buried man-made objects and unidentified hazardous waste 40 0.50

53 row - objections to right of way appraisal takes more time and/or money 40 0.50

54 pm - overlapping schedules; one contract delay causes chain reaction delays 40 0.50

55 pm - agreements 40 0.50

56 pm - pressure to deliver project on an accelerated schedule 40 0.50

57 relocate union pacific rr bridge over i-94 near the zoo by dec 2014 ($15 million in estimate). risk = ws dot loses case for in-line replacement. 40 0.60 -1.20
58 pm - unplanned work that must be accommodated 40 0.50

59 organizational - new priority project inserted into program 40 0.50

60 environmental - asbestos or lead paint 40 0.50

61 increased excavation costs 40 0.50 2.00
62 right of way closeout could be delayed if locals have limited resources to accept relinquishment of 680 on alt c 40 0.05
0.10
63 traffic study may be a vulnerable element in the eir/eis (land development/growth inducement) 40 0.10
0.30
64 i-285/sr400 interchange noise walls 40 0.25 0.50
65 floodplain issues may require design modifications 40 0.10 0.00
66 rwqcb permits may be slow and require late design changes during ps&e 40 0.05
0.10
67 nepa(national environmental policy act) 404 coordination process may be slow due to delegation of nepa authority 40 0.10
0.20
68 new requirements for air quality studies resulting from recent court cases, legislative actions (e.g., hra and ab 32) and county requirements are not completely defined but will likely require additional analyses by ct. 40 0.20
0.20
69 expected funding may be restricted in future 40 0.10
3.33
70 gab design optimization - sr400 cd lanes 40 0.30 -0.15
71 sr 400 lanes noise walls 40 0.50 -1.00
72 community issues, especially around noise or right of way impacts, may generate some local resistance to the project 40 0.05
0.10
73 colonial pipeline utility 40 0.80 0.40
74 retaining wall optimization - sr400 lanes 40 0.50 -0.50
75 nepa support (post-let) on sr400 lanes 40 0.75 0.38
76 nepa support (post-let) on i-285/sr400 interchange 40 0.75 0.38
77 additional mobilization and traffic control on sr400 lanes 40 0.50 1.50
78 rock excavation 40 0.20 0.05
79 botany, wetlands, fairy shrimp and cc goldfields approvals can be slow; may affect design; survey protocols need to be agreed upon and can be slow 40 0.10
0.20
80 project wide delay 40 0.90
10.80
81 construction staging to provide acceptable traffic flow will be a challenge 40 0.05
0.07
82 short construction seasons may overly constrain project construction 40 0.10
0.30
83 potential effects on special-status species and habitat could result in the need for mitigation sites for biological resources be identified before the pa/ed phase can be completed (i.e., before regulatory agencies issue the bo). 40 0.15 0.00
84 legal challenge (successful or not) to final eir/eis could delay construction and be costly. 40 0.10
0.30
85 failure to adequately plan for staging & phasing of utilities could cause delays before and during construction 40 0.10
0.13
86 cost estimate may fluctuate significantly prior to bid because cost and availability of materials is hard to estimate this far out 40 0.10 0.20

Export Results