#projects |
#Risks |
type |
delivery method |
size |
|
31 |
2079 |
All |
DBB |
All |
|
Number |
Risk |
Frequency |
Prob |
Cost |
Schedule |
1 |
right of way acquisition needed prior to utility relocations and construction |
100 |
0.47 |
5.97 |
1.08 |
2 |
delay in obtaining permits |
90.32 |
0.55 |
0.68 |
3.22 |
3 |
cooperation from utility owners for both reimbursable and non-reimbursable utility relocation. |
83.87 |
0.81 |
189.74 |
1.50 |
4 |
accurate and timely traveler information – during/after construction |
80.65 |
|
|
|
5 |
change orders |
64.52 |
0.67 |
7.05 |
0.77 |
6 |
hazardous materials |
61.29 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.96 |
7 |
delay in acquisition due to design change |
54.84 |
0.24 |
|
1.28 |
8 |
expectations – i.e. schedule |
51.61 |
|
|
|
9 |
right of way cost |
45.16 |
0.60 |
66.10 |
3.00 |
10 |
consistent message – even across stakeholders |
41.94 |
|
|
|
11 |
additional sound walls required |
41.94 |
0.32 |
1.59 |
2.00 |
12 |
higher real estate cost due to development, annexation, rezoning or other changes to currently vacant land that could greatly increase value |
41.94 |
0.14 |
0.67 |
1.00 |
13 |
local agency coordination |
41.94 |
0.10 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
14 |
permits or agency actions delayed or take longer than expected |
38.71 |
0.11 |
|
0.22 |
15 |
changes in design during design |
38.71 |
0.36 |
1.20 |
0.34 |
16 |
design changes on bridge or overpass |
38.71 |
0.38 |
0.23 |
1.35 |
17 |
increase cost for mitigation |
38.71 |
0.66 |
0.66 |
3.00 |
18 |
differing site conditions |
38.71 |
0.47 |
0.13 |
|
19 |
permit work windows |
38.71 |
0.17 |
1.00 |
0.74 |
20 |
hov operations during construction |
35.48 |
0.20 |
0.15 |
|
21 |
difficult relocations |
35.48 |
|
|
|
22 |
changes in alignment |
35.48 |
0.28 |
1.92 |
0.10 |
23 |
access management/ control of access areas |
35.48 |
|
|
|
24 |
potential changes to roadway design |
35.48 |
0.40 |
3.52 |
|
25 |
design coordination / approvals with other agencies affected by or affecting this project |
35.48 |
0.28 |
|
1.23 |
26 |
reduction in bridge superstructure depth using fibs |
32.26 |
0.68 |
0.17 |
2.00 |
27 |
changes to architectural, css, landscape design |
32.26 |
0.53 |
1.06 |
1.00 |
28 |
continuity in traffic flow throughout multiple projects |
32.26 |
|
|
|
29 |
right of way acquisition |
32.26 |
0.61 |
10.75 |
3.00 |
30 |
potential changes to geotechnical design for foundations |
32.26 |
0.44 |
-0.82 |
|
31 |
approval of design exceptions |
32.26 |
0.92 |
54.24 |
3.60 |
32 |
contractor access, staging coordination and constructability issues |
32.26 |
0.75 |
0.34 |
|
33 |
contract delay / change in scope due to project staging conflicts |
29.03 |
0.54 |
96.00 |
1.76 |
34 |
construction bids |
29.03 |
0.69 |
1.59 |
|
35 |
additional right of way is required |
29.03 |
0.33 |
1.24 |
1.76 |
36 |
potential delay in obtaining rod (record of decision) |
29.03 |
|
|
|
37 |
metro agreement, third party agreement |
29.03 |
|
|
|
38 |
traffic management - baseline solution does not work (late) |
29.03 |
0.40 |
3.01 |
2.00 |
39 |
interference from other projects |
29.03 |
0.10 |
|
2.11 |
40 |
construction funding shortfall |
29.03 |
0.30 |
18.50 |
6.60 |
41 |
hctra agreements, third party agreement |
29.03 |
0.75 |
|
3.13 |
42 |
construction change orders |
29.03 |
0.86 |
2.28 |
|
43 |
utility conflicts with foundations |
29.03 |
0.70 |
36.00 |
2.40 |
44 |
construction easements |
25.81 |
0.50 |
0.20 |
|
45 |
right of way unable to certify the project before advertising |
25.81 |
0.32 |
1.00 |
2.70 |
46 |
risk of acquiring additional access |
25.81 |
0.30 |
1.42 |
|
47 |
current txdot funding situation, including design and right of way funds |
25.81 |
|
|
|
48 |
stormwater |
25.81 |
0.63 |
1.55 |
0.15 |
49 |
changing geotechnical conditions |
25.81 |
0.27 |
0.51 |
|
50 |
bridge - changing geotechnical conditions (due to new information) on 8 |
25.81 |
0.37 |
5.83 |
1.38 |
51 |
additional hazardous or contaminated materials identified during preliminary investigation |
22.58 |
0.37 |
0.25 |
1.59 |
52 |
consultant contract authority exceeded before design is complete |
22.58 |
0.25 |
0.05 |
|
53 |
right of way funding shortage |
22.58 |
0.23 |
|
0.75 |
54 |
coordination and integration of operational elements (including fastrack) |
22.58 |
0.50 |
|
1.50 |
55 |
completion of environmental assessment and fonsi (finding of no significant impact) |
22.58 |
0.75 |
|
1.92 |
56 |
changes in profile |
22.58 |
0.53 |
0.05 |
|
57 |
market conditions |
22.58 |
0.20 |
3.00 |
2.00 |
58 |
weather delays |
22.58 |
0.25 |
|
0.50 |
59 |
bid price may be higher than engineers estimate for railroad project |
22.58 |
0.70 |
1.22 |
|
60 |
full traffic closures during construction |
22.58 |
0.38 |
7.53 |
-3.38 |
61 |
incident management |
22.58 |
0.10 |
0.02 |
|
62 |
noise walls - lawsuits |
22.58 |
0.80 |
2.00 |
|
63 |
design of drainage for service roads |
22.58 |
0.57 |
0.76 |
1.00 |
64 |
changing assumptions on technical issues in design stage |
22.58 |
0.47 |
1.65 |
|
65 |
field element are not compatible with tmc |
22.58 |
0.30 |
0.15 |
|
66 |
interim adjustments kept to a minimum |
22.58 |
|
|
|
67 |
utility agreements and mud(s) |
22.58 |
|
|
|
68 |
managing the limited number of appraisers |
22.58 |
|
|
|
69 |
additional mitigation for construction impacts (not captured elsewhere) |
22.58 |
0.43 |
1.50 |
0.07 |
70 |
outstanding task orders |
22.58 |
|
|
|
71 |
pleasing everyone |
22.58 |
|
|
|
72 |
delay in obtaining usace, uscg, nysdos, nycdcp, nysdec permits, permitting issues |
22.58 |
0.55 |
0.54 |
1.03 |
73 |
timing of regional conformity for interim implementation (one-lane reversible) |
22.58 |
|
|
|
74 |
the current plan is for unit 1 to open the managed lanes (south segment). delays to any other project could delay unit 1 and the opening of the managed lanes. |
22.58 |
0.50 |
0.25 |
|
75 |
bridge coordination efforts with hctra, metro, and uprr |
22.58 |
|
|
|
76 |
meeting design criteria in highly developed corridor |
22.58 |
|
|
|
77 |
phase 3 support cost risk for segment 1 |
22.58 |
1.00 |
4.89 |
|
78 |
contract change orders, claims |
22.58 |
0.61 |
4.79 |
|
79 |
market conditions at bid time different than assumed in the base |
22.58 |
0.34 |
0.30 |
|
80 |
construction permitting issues (incl. work restrictions) |
22.58 |
|
|
|
81 |
high condemnation rates |
22.58 |
|
|
|
82 |
credibility – keeping promises |
22.58 |
|
|
|
83 |
replacement strategy decision for ammo road and miramar way oc. |
22.58 |
|
|
|
84 |
limited contractor’s availability to perform work |
19.35 |
|
|
|
85 |
structures |
19.35 |
0.72 |
41.33 |
|
86 |
utility conflicts with drainage system |
19.35 |
0.40 |
72.00 |
2.40 |
87 |
nonconforming work results in schedule delay and additional costs |
19.35 |
|
|
|
88 |
environmental regulations change |
19.35 |
0.09 |
1.08 |
0.255555555555556 |
89 |
interchange construction |
19.35 |
0.5 |
5.63 |
|
90 |
xcel, eaglenet/cdot fiber and other utilities |
19.35 |
0.725 |
1.87 |
3 |
91 |
potential scope changes driven by stake holders. |
19.35 |
0.358333333333333 |
0.85 |
|
92 |
oil price |
19.35 |
0.48125 |
11.01 |
0 |
93 |
interest rates rise just before sell bonds |
19.35 |
0.6 |
|
|
94 |
material availability |
19.35 |
0.3 |
0.45 |
0.515 |
95 |
access points |
19.35 |
|
|
|
96 |
material costs |
19.35 |
0.8 |
3.24 |
|
97 |
public involvement issues |
19.35 |
0.5 |
1.50 |
4.5 |
98 |
landscaping and aesthetics |
19.35 |
|
|
|
99 |
slab replacement/repair impacts construction cost and schedule |
19.35 |
0.1 |
0.50 |
0.6625 |
100 |
changed traffic control and staging requirements |
19.35 |
0.6 |
8.34 |
|